Difference between revisions of "Talk:Aimfiz"

From IFWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Same issue in Fweep article)
(Added disclaimer since there *is* a spec)
 
Line 7: Line 7:
 
[[User:Samiam|Samiam]] 22:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 
[[User:Samiam|Samiam]] 22:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 
:Also applies to [[Fweep]] [[User:Samiam|Samiam]] 22:41, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 
:Also applies to [[Fweep]] [[User:Samiam|Samiam]] 22:41, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 +
::While there isn’t a standards committee, there ''is'' a specification, so I have added this disclaimer: “These versions are not described in the 1997 [http://mirror.ifarchive.org/indexes/if-archiveXinfocomXinterpretersXspecification.html Z-machine specification] 1.0 nor in the 2006 [http://mirror.ifarchive.org/if-archive/infocom/interpreters/specification/ZSpec11.txt Z-machine specification 1.1] (the most recent version)”.  [[User:Samiam|Samiam]] 01:02, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:02, 14 January 2014

We shouldn’t call v9 and v10 files “nonstandard”

I really do not see the point of calling v9 and v10 files non-standard, as done in this edit. There is no standards committee who defines what a Z-machine file is, and with most new development happening with Glulx, there should not be anyone who will make a Z-machine file which conflicts with Aimfiz’s v9 and v10 extensions.

I have created the article Z-machine versions to keep track of the various versions of Z machine files and have removed the designation of the v9 and v10 files as being “nonstandard”.

Samiam 22:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Also applies to Fweep Samiam 22:41, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
While there isn’t a standards committee, there is a specification, so I have added this disclaimer: “These versions are not described in the 1997 Z-machine specification 1.0 nor in the 2006 Z-machine specification 1.1 (the most recent version)”. Samiam 01:02, 14 January 2014 (UTC)