Difference between revisions of "Talk:New Glk styles"
From IFWiki
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
: I threw this up as an experiment, really, to see whether there *was* going to be wiki discussion. Apparently not. [[User:Erkyrath|Erkyrath]] 21:31, 6 December 2009 (UTC) | : I threw this up as an experiment, really, to see whether there *was* going to be wiki discussion. Apparently not. [[User:Erkyrath|Erkyrath]] 21:31, 6 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
− | I suggest not making it something as complicated as CSS and HTML. --[[User:Zzo38|Zzo38]] 16:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC) | + | I suggest not making it something as complicated as CSS and HTML (I suppose such thing is OK in a Blorb resource, but it should not be part of the VM). --[[User:Zzo38|Zzo38]] 16:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:08, 8 September 2013
I have no objection to this page being here, but I suspect IFWiki is a poor place to hold a discussion. You might have better luck having the actual discussion on http://www.intfiction.org/forum/ , for example. And you'll want to spread the word around that this page exists. Don't count on people finding it by casually browsing the wiki. -- David Welbourn 19:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- There's already a RAIF thread with the discussion and a link to this IFWiki page.
- I think we should mention somewhere in the page that it's by Andrew Plotkin: it's not necessarily obvious for people who find this page and didn't read the RAIF discussion... --Eriorg 02:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- I threw this up as an experiment, really, to see whether there *was* going to be wiki discussion. Apparently not. Erkyrath 21:31, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
I suggest not making it something as complicated as CSS and HTML (I suppose such thing is OK in a Blorb resource, but it should not be part of the VM). --Zzo38 16:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC)