From IFWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

hm, having two similar looking tables seems awkward to me, especially when the axises are different. Do we really need two tables? Why is certain info repeated? And can we at least (at first) have the interpreter names go downward on the left side of the tables, and have them listed in alphabetical order? (I'd rather have these tables grow downward than rightward, as new interpreters are added to a table.) The current arrangement looks a bit hodgepodge to me at the moment. -- David Welbourn 12:10, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Indeed, I didn't do all the edits yet. My thoughts are to change the second table to represent only packaged interpreters, such as Zoom and Gargoyle. Some terps like Git only exist packaged by others, so it would have info on them. Changing them both to having the name on the left makes sense too. Also the first table is in alphabetic order except for the reference implementation. --Dannii 06:48, 18 August 2010 (UTC)