Category talk:Games: Difference between revisions

From IFWiki

m (typo)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Good idea, David - I hadn't seen your [[Games Page Format for IFWiki]] page. My idea was to do something more than just duplicating the baf's Guide info here. The main purpose as I saw it was to enable wiki writers to link to particularly interesting or successful games from other articles, not to create a full index of all games here.  
Good idea, David - I hadn't seen your [[Games Page Format for IFWiki]] page. My idea was to do something more than just duplicating the baf's Guide info here. The main purpose as I saw it was to enable wiki writers to link to particularly interesting or successful games from other articles, not to create a full index of all games here.  
--[[User:Pesononline|Pesononline]] 03:17, 15 Mar 2005 (Central Standard Time)
--[[User:Pesononline|Pesononline]] 03:17, 15 Mar 2005 (Central Standard Time)
This is where I might suggest we (probably me) create some sort of Baf's section that is uneditable. There would be some sort of macro, like <nokwiki>{{baf id=7}}</nowiki> that would automagically create the section on the given page. All the information would come from BAF's and maintained there.
--[[User:David Cornelson|David Cornelson]] 10:42, 15 Mar 2005 (Central Standard Time)

Revision as of 16:42, 15 March 2005

Good idea, David - I hadn't seen your Games Page Format for IFWiki page. My idea was to do something more than just duplicating the baf's Guide info here. The main purpose as I saw it was to enable wiki writers to link to particularly interesting or successful games from other articles, not to create a full index of all games here. --Pesononline 03:17, 15 Mar 2005 (Central Standard Time)

This is where I might suggest we (probably me) create some sort of Baf's section that is uneditable. There would be some sort of macro, like <nokwiki>Template:Baf id=7</nowiki> that would automagically create the section on the given page. All the information would come from BAF's and maintained there. --David Cornelson 10:42, 15 Mar 2005 (Central Standard Time)