Talk:IFComp 2015: Difference between revisions
From IFWiki
(→To Burn in Memory Platform: reply re authoring system and platform) |
m (Bg moved page Talk:21st Annual Interactive Fiction Competition to Talk:IFComp 2015: Using shorter title to be consistent with more recent IFComp pages, which have short titles to work better with the event database.) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
According to http://www.intfiction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=18442, ''To Burn in Memory'' was made in a custom platform highly based on Paradise. How should this be represented? --[[User:Floating Info|Floating Info]] 21:53, 1 October 2015 (UTC) | According to http://www.intfiction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=18442, ''To Burn in Memory'' was made in a custom platform highly based on Paradise. How should this be represented? --[[User:Floating Info|Floating Info]] 21:53, 1 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
* I would write the [http://ifwiki.org/index.php/Game_reference_%28style_guide%29 | * I would write the [http://ifwiki.org/index.php/Game_reference_%28style_guide%29 reference] as ''[[To Burn in Memory]]'' ([[Orihaus]]; custom system; Web browser), although it's also okay to leave the "custom system" part out. When and if the author names their authoring system, we can name it also. I think by using "custom system" in lowercase, it should be clear(er) that we're not referring to an authoring system named Custom. -- [[User:Dswxyz|David Welbourn]] ([[User talk:Dswxyz|talk]]) 08:14, 2 October 2015 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:39, 8 August 2023
To Burn in Memory Platform
According to http://www.intfiction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=18442, To Burn in Memory was made in a custom platform highly based on Paradise. How should this be represented? --Floating Info 21:53, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- I would write the reference as To Burn in Memory (Orihaus; custom system; Web browser), although it's also okay to leave the "custom system" part out. When and if the author names their authoring system, we can name it also. I think by using "custom system" in lowercase, it should be clear(er) that we're not referring to an authoring system named Custom. -- David Welbourn (talk) 08:14, 2 October 2015 (UTC)