Talk:A Writer's Guide to Interactive Fiction: Difference between revisions

From IFWiki

(Question...)
 
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I guess this is an existing article? I could add stuff, but I don't want to interrupt the flow of the original and/or have my contributions trashed later. :)
I guess this is an existing article? I could add stuff, but I don't want to interrupt the flow of the original and/or have my contributions trashed later. -- [[User:Aurora|Aurora]] February 11, 2005
 
That's the nature of a wiki though. I would edit as you see fit. Where opinions branch, that should be worked into the format of the article. So if there are two different viewpoints, have two subsections covering both. --[[User:David Cornelson|David Cornelson]] 12:42, 11 Feb 2005 (Central Standard Time)
 
Let me rephrase. It looks like this is an existing article and someone is busy entering it in a wiki format. It's more efficient for me to wait until this is done and then fill in the holes, rather than say stuff that the original article may already say. --[[User:Aurora|Aurora]]
 
This has been inactive since January, is still empty, and may be too far-reaching in scope. What do we want to do with it? -- [[User:Maga|Maga]] 08:55, 29 Oct 2005 (Central Daylight Time)
* My feeling is to move the one ref here to Craft#Writing and delete this article. Sorry, Dave. -- [[User:Dswxyz|David Welbourn]] 15:55, 29 Oct 2005 (Central Daylight Time)

Latest revision as of 20:55, 29 October 2005

I guess this is an existing article? I could add stuff, but I don't want to interrupt the flow of the original and/or have my contributions trashed later. -- Aurora February 11, 2005

That's the nature of a wiki though. I would edit as you see fit. Where opinions branch, that should be worked into the format of the article. So if there are two different viewpoints, have two subsections covering both. --David Cornelson 12:42, 11 Feb 2005 (Central Standard Time)

Let me rephrase. It looks like this is an existing article and someone is busy entering it in a wiki format. It's more efficient for me to wait until this is done and then fill in the holes, rather than say stuff that the original article may already say. --Aurora

This has been inactive since January, is still empty, and may be too far-reaching in scope. What do we want to do with it? -- Maga 08:55, 29 Oct 2005 (Central Daylight Time)

  • My feeling is to move the one ref here to Craft#Writing and delete this article. Sorry, Dave. -- David Welbourn 15:55, 29 Oct 2005 (Central Daylight Time)