Talk:Renga in Blue: Difference between revisions
From IFWiki
(Created page with 'I suggest that blog-pages would be most useful if they contain links and short descriptions of important entries. Here, an 'important' entry is probably one that has something to…') |
(reply to Victor) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I suggest that blog-pages would be most useful if they contain links and short descriptions of important entries. Here, an 'important' entry is probably one that has something to say, and itsn't just a short comment or a link to something else. Do you agree? [[User:VictorGijsbers|VictorGijsbers]] 22:35, 18 October 2009 (UTC) | I suggest that blog-pages would be most useful if they contain links and short descriptions of important entries. Here, an 'important' entry is probably one that has something to say, and itsn't just a short comment or a link to something else. Do you agree? [[User:VictorGijsbers|VictorGijsbers]] 22:35, 18 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
: I admit, I haven't given blog-pages all that much thought to date. Certainly this appears to be an improvement to what was there before. Hm. I think, if a blog's entries are tagged in any way by its author, we ought to have a list of links to those tags (if they are IF-related) at the bottom of the article. Also, I can't help but think that summarizing blogs will require quite a bit of work. And what should we call blogs that don't really have their own names? -- [[User:Dswxyz|David Welbourn]] 23:05, 18 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:05, 18 October 2009
I suggest that blog-pages would be most useful if they contain links and short descriptions of important entries. Here, an 'important' entry is probably one that has something to say, and itsn't just a short comment or a link to something else. Do you agree? VictorGijsbers 22:35, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- I admit, I haven't given blog-pages all that much thought to date. Certainly this appears to be an improvement to what was there before. Hm. I think, if a blog's entries are tagged in any way by its author, we ought to have a list of links to those tags (if they are IF-related) at the bottom of the article. Also, I can't help but think that summarizing blogs will require quite a bit of work. And what should we call blogs that don't really have their own names? -- David Welbourn 23:05, 18 October 2009 (UTC)