Talk:New Glk styles: Difference between revisions

From IFWiki

(Created page with 'I have no objection to this page being here, but I suspect IFWiki is a poor place to hold a discussion. You might have better luck having the actual discussion on http://www.intf…')
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
I have no objection to this page being here, but I suspect IFWiki is a poor place to hold a discussion. You might have better luck having the actual discussion on http://www.intfiction.org/forum/ , for example. And you'll want to spread the word around that this page exists. Don't count on people finding it by casually browsing the wiki. -- [[User:Dswxyz|David Welbourn]] 19:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
I have no objection to this page being here, but I suspect IFWiki is a poor place to hold a discussion. You might have better luck having the actual discussion on http://www.intfiction.org/forum/ , for example. And you'll want to spread the word around that this page exists. Don't count on people finding it by casually browsing the wiki. -- [[User:Dswxyz|David Welbourn]] 19:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
: There's already a [http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.int-fiction/browse_thread/thread/618bddaab693e0ec/38656971a8e8bc8c RAIF thread] with the discussion and a link to this IFWiki page.
: I think we should mention somewhere in the page that it's by [[Andrew Plotkin]]: it's not necessarily obvious for people who find this page and didn't read the RAIF discussion... --[[User:Eriorg|Eriorg]] 02:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:03, 2 December 2009

I have no objection to this page being here, but I suspect IFWiki is a poor place to hold a discussion. You might have better luck having the actual discussion on http://www.intfiction.org/forum/ , for example. And you'll want to spread the word around that this page exists. Don't count on people finding it by casually browsing the wiki. -- David Welbourn 19:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

There's already a RAIF thread with the discussion and a link to this IFWiki page.
I think we should mention somewhere in the page that it's by Andrew Plotkin: it's not necessarily obvious for people who find this page and didn't read the RAIF discussion... --Eriorg 02:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)