Talk:People (style guide): Difference between revisions
From IFWiki
No edit summary |
m (oops, forgot to sign) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It is becoming more obvious that we're going to need a more explicit way of dealing with crediting people who have '''ported''' other people's games. I get the impression that contributors want to keep porting credits separate from normal author credits; perhaps we want a 'Porting Credits' section? Also, I would really prefer to see ported game references to be in the style of: | It is becoming more obvious that we're going to need a more explicit way of dealing with crediting people who have '''ported''' other people's games. I get the impression that contributors want to keep porting credits separate from normal author credits; perhaps we want a 'Porting Credits' section? Also, I would really prefer to see ported game references to be in the style of: | ||
* ''Ported Game Name'' (porter: Porter's Name; date; ported-platform). Ported from ''Previous Game Name'' (authors; date; previous-platform). | * ''Ported Game Name'' (porter: Porter's Name; date; ported-platform). Ported from ''Previous Game Name'' (authors; date; previous-platform). | ||
-- [[User:Dswxyz|David Welbourn]] 20:04, 16 May 2005 (Central Daylight Time) | |||
Revision as of 01:04, 17 May 2005
It is becoming more obvious that we're going to need a more explicit way of dealing with crediting people who have ported other people's games. I get the impression that contributors want to keep porting credits separate from normal author credits; perhaps we want a 'Porting Credits' section? Also, I would really prefer to see ported game references to be in the style of:
- Ported Game Name (porter: Porter's Name; date; ported-platform). Ported from Previous Game Name (authors; date; previous-platform).
-- David Welbourn 20:04, 16 May 2005 (Central Daylight Time)