Talk:Games Released in 1980: Difference between revisions
(+Sierra/On-Line Systems comment) |
(My view on Sierra/On-line Systems) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
=Sierra/On-Line Systems= | =Sierra/On-Line Systems= | ||
Their first few releases were under the ''On-Line Systems'' label, and I believe the ''publisher'' field should reflect that (even though the link points to "Sierra"). --[[User:Mara|Mara]] 15:07, 10 July 2006 (EST) | Their first few releases were under the ''On-Line Systems'' label, and I believe the ''publisher'' field should reflect that (even though the link points to "Sierra"). --[[User:Mara|Mara]] 15:07, 10 July 2006 (EST) | ||
"Sierra" is how they're now remembered. I personally think it would be clearer if the Sierra and Ken Williams pages said something along the lines of "... Sierra On-line -- originally known as On-line Systems -- ..." and the publisher link remained at Sierra. However, if you want to change it, please make sure that all the links actually work, and that you change the games' entries on all relevant pages to the new form, so that the whole story remains consistent. Thanks -- [[User:Roger|Roger]] 10:42, 11 July 2006 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 15:42, 11 July 2006
Is this a game or an authoring system? --User:Roger (asking about Eamon)
- It's a game, though its modular base has been reused to create new adventures. --Mara 15:02, 10 July 2006 (EST)
Sierra/On-Line Systems
Their first few releases were under the On-Line Systems label, and I believe the publisher field should reflect that (even though the link points to "Sierra"). --Mara 15:07, 10 July 2006 (EST)
"Sierra" is how they're now remembered. I personally think it would be clearer if the Sierra and Ken Williams pages said something along the lines of "... Sierra On-line -- originally known as On-line Systems -- ..." and the publisher link remained at Sierra. However, if you want to change it, please make sure that all the links actually work, and that you change the games' entries on all relevant pages to the new form, so that the whole story remains consistent. Thanks -- Roger 10:42, 11 July 2006 (EST)