Talk:A Writer's Guide to Interactive Fiction: Difference between revisions
From IFWiki
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
That's the nature of a wiki though. I would edit as you see fit. Where opinions branch, that should be worked into the format of the article. So if there are two different viewpoints, have two subsections covering both. --[[User:David Cornelson|David Cornelson]] 12:42, 11 Feb 2005 (Central Standard Time) | That's the nature of a wiki though. I would edit as you see fit. Where opinions branch, that should be worked into the format of the article. So if there are two different viewpoints, have two subsections covering both. --[[User:David Cornelson|David Cornelson]] 12:42, 11 Feb 2005 (Central Standard Time) | ||
Let me rephrase. It looks like this is an existing article and someone is busy entering it in a wiki format. It's more efficient for me to wait until this is done and then fill in the holes, rather than say stuff that the original article may already say. | |||
Revision as of 18:59, 14 February 2005
I guess this is an existing article? I could add stuff, but I don't want to interrupt the flow of the original and/or have my contributions trashed later. -- Aurora February 11, 2005
That's the nature of a wiki though. I would edit as you see fit. Where opinions branch, that should be worked into the format of the article. So if there are two different viewpoints, have two subsections covering both. --David Cornelson 12:42, 11 Feb 2005 (Central Standard Time)
Let me rephrase. It looks like this is an existing article and someone is busy entering it in a wiki format. It's more efficient for me to wait until this is done and then fill in the holes, rather than say stuff that the original article may already say.