User talk:Dswxyz: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(accreditive PC definition) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
-Stollman | -Stollman | ||
==Accreditive PC== | |||
Hi Dswxyz. Regarding your edits to [[Varicella]] I would like to know what an [[accreditive PC]] means. Is it a neologism or something? I was not able to find its definition anywhere. Thanks in advance! :) -- [[User:Cassandra Palop|Cassandra Palop]] 04:01, 28 November 2006 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 09:01, 28 November 2006
Hi David, thanks for your edits. The howto:tads kind of syntax was because I was confused about how categories work, thanks for fixing it.
On tutorial vs howto, I was assuming tutorial meant longer, more comprehensive articles that tried to cover a language as a whole; while howto would be more like individual faq answers on common tasks. But if you think that the smaller topics fit well in tutorial, I won't argue. :-)
When I start putting things in, I'll use the naming conventions you have suggested.
-Stollman
Accreditive PC
Hi Dswxyz. Regarding your edits to Varicella I would like to know what an accreditive PC means. Is it a neologism or something? I was not able to find its definition anywhere. Thanks in advance! :) -- Cassandra Palop 04:01, 28 November 2006 (EST)