Talk:Being Steve: Difference between revisions
From IFWiki
No edit summary |
m ((forgot to add my name)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I have removed several phrases which did not seem to be neutral enough for IFWiki: "major" IF theorist, "crudely written" attack piece, that kind of stuff. What I left seems justified to me. In particular, I think that including the comment that "Steve Breslin himself has never written any attack pieces." is justified: it is a factual statement, and relevant for the appraisal of Being Steve. | I have removed several phrases which did not seem to be neutral enough for IFWiki: "major" IF theorist, "crudely written" attack piece, that kind of stuff. What I left seems justified to me. In particular, I think that including the comment that "Steve Breslin himself has never written any attack pieces." is justified: it is a factual statement, and relevant for the appraisal of Being Steve. [[User:VictorGijsbers|VictorGijsbers]] 07:16, 3 May 2009 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:16, 3 May 2009
I have removed several phrases which did not seem to be neutral enough for IFWiki: "major" IF theorist, "crudely written" attack piece, that kind of stuff. What I left seems justified to me. In particular, I think that including the comment that "Steve Breslin himself has never written any attack pieces." is justified: it is a factual statement, and relevant for the appraisal of Being Steve. VictorGijsbers 07:16, 3 May 2009 (PDT)