Renga in Blue: Difference between revisions
From IFWiki
(First few entries added. This is what a blog-page should look like, IMHO! See discussion.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* [http://bluerenga.wordpress.com/2005/02/04/natural-action/ Natural action]. Suggests that natural actions, that is, actions that are not puzzles, conform to one of the following three criteria: (1) there is direct instruction to the player, (2) they are repetitions of a puzzle in identical contexts, or (3) they are connected enough to a player’s background and context that no thought is required. Asks the question whether there could be an enjoyable game with ''only'' natural actions. | * [http://bluerenga.wordpress.com/2005/02/04/natural-action/ Natural action]. Suggests that natural actions, that is, actions that are not puzzles, conform to one of the following three criteria: (1) there is direct instruction to the player, (2) they are repetitions of a puzzle in identical contexts, or (3) they are connected enough to a player’s background and context that no thought is required. Asks the question whether there could be an enjoyable game with ''only'' natural actions. | ||
* [http://bluerenga.wordpress.com/2005/02/05/soup-cans/ Soup cans]. Discusses the difference between in-world non-story-related puzzles, and metaphorical non-story-related puzzles. Suggests that the latter can be used effectively in IF. | * [http://bluerenga.wordpress.com/2005/02/05/soup-cans/ Soup cans]. Discusses the difference between in-world non-story-related puzzles, and metaphorical non-story-related puzzles. Suggests that the latter can be used effectively in IF. | ||
* [http://bluerenga.wordpress.com/2005/02/17/designing-multiplayer-puzzles/ Designing multiplayer puzzles]. Suggests that there are three principles of designing a good multiplayer puzzle: (1) Asymmetry: the players must not all do the same things. (2) Uniqueness: the players must have different powers or options, either temporarily or permanently. (3) Dependency: the players are dependent on each other for successfully carrying out their own task. | |||
===Conversation=== | |||
* [http://bluerenga.wordpress.com/2005/02/09/conversational-cutscenes/ Conversational cutscenes]. Argues that menu-based dialogues are not necessarily less interactive than asktell-systems. Suggests that there are three ways around the infodumping NPC: (1) have the reply depend on the mood of the NPC, as in [[Galatea]]; (2) have the reply depend on the situation in the game; (3) have dialogue options that are mutually exclusive. | |||
* [http://bluerenga.wordpress.com/2005/02/10/telling-ambiguity/ Telling ambiguity]. Argues that 'tell X about Y' is problematic, since it will often lead to ambiguities. | |||
===Assorted topics=== | ===Assorted topics=== | ||
Revision as of 22:46, 18 October 2009
Renga in Blue is Jason Dyer's blog about interactive fiction.
Game design
Puzzles and non-puzzles
- Structural elements vs. puzzles. Discusses the dividing line between a puzzle and a structural element of play. (The latter term is replaced by 'natural action' in a later post.)
- Natural action. Suggests that natural actions, that is, actions that are not puzzles, conform to one of the following three criteria: (1) there is direct instruction to the player, (2) they are repetitions of a puzzle in identical contexts, or (3) they are connected enough to a player’s background and context that no thought is required. Asks the question whether there could be an enjoyable game with only natural actions.
- Soup cans. Discusses the difference between in-world non-story-related puzzles, and metaphorical non-story-related puzzles. Suggests that the latter can be used effectively in IF.
- Designing multiplayer puzzles. Suggests that there are three principles of designing a good multiplayer puzzle: (1) Asymmetry: the players must not all do the same things. (2) Uniqueness: the players must have different powers or options, either temporarily or permanently. (3) Dependency: the players are dependent on each other for successfully carrying out their own task.
Conversation
- Conversational cutscenes. Argues that menu-based dialogues are not necessarily less interactive than asktell-systems. Suggests that there are three ways around the infodumping NPC: (1) have the reply depend on the mood of the NPC, as in Galatea; (2) have the reply depend on the situation in the game; (3) have dialogue options that are mutually exclusive.
- Telling ambiguity. Argues that 'tell X about Y' is problematic, since it will often lead to ambiguities.
Assorted topics
- Fatalism. Suggests that letting the player carry out 'stupid' or 'dangerous' actions is often a better design choice than saying that this is 'too dangerous'. "Being able to hit the door one is frustrated with is a form of catharsis, even if it results in player death via stubbed toe."
General topics
Taxonomy of games
- Categories of interactive fiction. Outlines five kinds of interactive fiction: parser-based IF, gamebooks, CYOA, hypertext and chatterbots. (Several visual files linked to in the post have disappeared from the net, so this entry is now of limited use.)