Talk:Renga in Blue: Difference between revisions
From IFWiki
(reply to Victor) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: I admit, I haven't given blog-pages all that much thought to date. Certainly this appears to be an improvement to what was there before. Hm. I think, if a blog's entries are tagged in any way by its author, we ought to have a list of links to those tags (if they are IF-related) at the bottom of the article. Also, I can't help but think that summarizing blogs will require quite a bit of work. And what should we call blogs that don't really have their own names? -- [[User:Dswxyz|David Welbourn]] 23:05, 18 October 2009 (UTC) | : I admit, I haven't given blog-pages all that much thought to date. Certainly this appears to be an improvement to what was there before. Hm. I think, if a blog's entries are tagged in any way by its author, we ought to have a list of links to those tags (if they are IF-related) at the bottom of the article. Also, I can't help but think that summarizing blogs will require quite a bit of work. And what should we call blogs that don't really have their own names? -- [[User:Dswxyz|David Welbourn]] 23:05, 18 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
:: Yes, it is quite a bit of work, but if we have some clear examples we might get the blog authors to help us themselves. Who knows? At least we can try. Also, ideally, we would have a page 'conversation' which links to all the blog posts about conversations, and so on. It doesn't have to be finished tomorrow. ;) What do you mean by blogs that don't have their own names? [[User:VictorGijsbers|VictorGijsbers]] 23:07, 18 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:07, 18 October 2009
I suggest that blog-pages would be most useful if they contain links and short descriptions of important entries. Here, an 'important' entry is probably one that has something to say, and itsn't just a short comment or a link to something else. Do you agree? VictorGijsbers 22:35, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- I admit, I haven't given blog-pages all that much thought to date. Certainly this appears to be an improvement to what was there before. Hm. I think, if a blog's entries are tagged in any way by its author, we ought to have a list of links to those tags (if they are IF-related) at the bottom of the article. Also, I can't help but think that summarizing blogs will require quite a bit of work. And what should we call blogs that don't really have their own names? -- David Welbourn 23:05, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, it is quite a bit of work, but if we have some clear examples we might get the blog authors to help us themselves. Who knows? At least we can try. Also, ideally, we would have a page 'conversation' which links to all the blog posts about conversations, and so on. It doesn't have to be finished tomorrow. ;) What do you mean by blogs that don't have their own names? VictorGijsbers 23:07, 18 October 2009 (UTC)