Category talk:Extensions: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Extension is not a genre. Please use the plural, Extensions, assuming we need this category at all. The genre categories were made before the category guideline was established, and in any case, we don't forbid singular-named categories, we merely prefer the plural over the singular for them. In any case, we ''definitely'' don't need both categories. Also, where in the hierarchy of IFWiki categories should this one be placed? -- [[User:Dswxyz|David Welbourn]] 08:05, 28 October 2010 (UTC) | Extension is not a genre. Please use the plural, Extensions, assuming we need this category at all. The genre categories were made before the category guideline was established, and in any case, we don't forbid singular-named categories, we merely prefer the plural over the singular for them. In any case, we ''definitely'' don't need both categories. Also, where in the hierarchy of IFWiki categories should this one be placed? -- [[User:Dswxyz|David Welbourn]] 08:05, 28 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
The approach you've implemented here looks great and is obviously more robust than the one I hacked together; thanks again. --[[User:RogerC|RogerC]] 16:04, 28 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:04, 28 October 2010
Er, do you really need two categories, Extension and Extensions? Anyway, the Categories (style guide) says the plural is preferred. --Eriorg 00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure I don't need both -- but it seems like, contrary to any style guides, the genre categories are universally singular; e.g., Comedy. --RogerC
Extension is not a genre. Please use the plural, Extensions, assuming we need this category at all. The genre categories were made before the category guideline was established, and in any case, we don't forbid singular-named categories, we merely prefer the plural over the singular for them. In any case, we definitely don't need both categories. Also, where in the hierarchy of IFWiki categories should this one be placed? -- David Welbourn 08:05, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
The approach you've implemented here looks great and is obviously more robust than the one I hacked together; thanks again. --RogerC 16:04, 28 October 2010 (UTC)