IFWiki:Copyright discussions (2005)
Overview
We are in the midst of a licensing discussion for ifwiki. There are two proposals so far, some reference material, and some heated discussion. For background, here is a summary of events:
- David Cornelson purchased the domain ifwiki.org, installed MediaWiki software, and setup ifwiki on a server in his basement. The database for ifwiki can be mirrored by anyone wishing to do so. See MediaWiki for notes on hardware/software requirements.
- David Cornelson asked Dennis Jerz for permission to load the IF Theory Glossary into ifwiki. Dennis leapt at the opportunity to revitalize the community-built glossary. David Welbourn began to help out and in fact completed the task almost entirely on his own.
- David Cornelson also received permission from Gunther Schmidl to move the Speed-IF index from fourcoffees.com to ifwiki. He started this process and then David Welbourn completed it.
- David Welbourn began to add indexes for certain IF people and game lists.
- Nick Montfort added an FAQ for IF and invited others to share in the writing.
- David Cornelson added IF related indexes and asked others to share in the writing.
- Nick Montfort began talking about copyright and licensing issues. He proposed the Creative Commons license.
- David Welbourn had a negative reaction to the licensing proposal and eventually dissented.
- Others weighed in with their opinions.
- Nick Montfort garnered approval from all FAQ writers to implement the Creative Commons license for the FAQ separate from ifwiki licensing.
- David Cornelson proposed a Public Domain license with the ability to create copyrighted articles.
- Nick and Dave discuss Dave's proposal on ifMUD
Proposals
Discussion
- Founding Agreement comments by David Welbourn on 1-19-2005 at 22:13 CST
- Founding Agreement comments by Nick Montfort on 1-20-2005 at 1:26 CST
- Founding Agreement comments by Jon Rosebaugh on 1-20-2005 at 1:51 CST
- Founding Agreement comments by Sean Barrett on 1-20-2005 at 6:33 CST
- Founding Agreement comments by Nick Montfort on 1-20-2005 at 15:04 CST
- Founding Agreement comments by David Cornelson on 1-20-2005 at 15:50 CST
- Founding Agreement Comments by Sean Barrett on 1-20-2005 at 21:46 CST
- Founding Agreement Comments on ifMUD on 1-20-2005 at 23:50 CST
- Founding Agreement Comments on ifMUD on 1-22-2005 at 1:13 CST
- Founding Agreement comments by J. Robinson Wheeler on 1-24-2005 at 2:01 CST
References
What the Portland Pattern Repository has done in this area...
The Portland Pattern Repository was the first ever wiki. They've had their own discussions about copyright and licensing. I hope this doesn't add to confusion, but I thought that looking at similar discussions that have happened before might help somewhat. Or cloud the water. I hate not having MUD access at home... --Jon 12:32, 20 Jan 2005 (Central Standard Time)
Issues
- Are the original IF Theory Glossary items copyrighted?
- If yes, then how do we attribute and license them?
- If no, what license will they have?
- What kinds of content will we have that might have conflicting or varied licenses?
- Glossary Items
- Shared Articles without a main author
- Articles with a byline and editors
- References to external databases such as Baf's
- How are anonymous authors or editors attributed?
Creative Commons Agreements
I agree to let ifwiki license my existing contributions under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license. --Nm 18:32, 15 Jan 2005 (Central Standard Time)
I agree to let ifwiki license my existing contributions of the FAQ Article under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license. All other contributions are in reserve until further notice. --David Cornelson 14:18, 23 Jan 2005 (Central Standard Time)
I agree to let ifwiki license my existing contributions under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license, and monkeys are hereby declared funny, and ever henceforth shall it be. -- Maga 09:35, 16 Jan 2005 (Central Standard Time)
I agree to let ifwiki license my existing contributions under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license. --inky 15:58, 17 Jan 2005 (Central Standard Time)
I agree to let ifwiki license my existing contributions under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license. Such as they are. I'm pretty damn lazy. --Jon 16:32, 19 Jan 2005 (Central Standard Time)
I agree with CC licenses, and I assert that Dave's fears are caused by gross misintepretation (but, seriously, who the hell am I?). I use CC at my own "interactive" fiction wiki. --Morbus Iff 08:44, 28 Jan 2005 (Central Standard Time)